🔗 Share this article

These days present a very unique situation: the first-ever US parade of the babysitters. They vary in their skills and traits, but they all have the same mission – to avert an Israeli infringement, or even destruction, of the delicate peace agreement. Since the hostilities ended, there have been scant days without at least one of the former president's representatives on the scene. Only in the last few days saw the arrival of Jared Kushner, Steve Witkoff, a senator and a political figure – all coming to carry out their assignments.

Israel engages them fully. In just a few days it initiated a wave of operations in the region after the killings of a pair of Israeli military troops – resulting, according to reports, in many of Palestinian fatalities. Multiple ministers demanded a renewal of the war, and the Knesset passed a early decision to take over the West Bank. The US response was somehow ranging from “no” and “hell no.”

But in several ways, the US leadership seems more focused on upholding the current, uneasy phase of the truce than on advancing to the next: the rebuilding of Gaza. Regarding that, it seems the US may have goals but little specific plans.

For now, it is unclear at what point the suggested global governing body will actually take power, and the identical goes for the designated military contingent – or even the identity of its members. On Tuesday, Vance stated the US would not force the membership of the international force on Israel. But if the prime minister's government continues to reject various proposals – as it acted with the Ankara's proposal lately – what follows? There is also the contrary question: who will determine whether the troops supported by Israel are even prepared in the assignment?

The issue of the duration it will take to disarm Hamas is similarly vague. “The aim in the government is that the multinational troops is intends to now take charge in demilitarizing the organization,” said the official this week. “That’s will require some time.” Trump further emphasized the ambiguity, stating in an interview a few days ago that there is no “fixed” schedule for Hamas to disarm. So, hypothetically, the unidentified members of this yet-to-be-formed international contingent could enter the territory while Hamas members still remain in control. Would they be facing a leadership or a militant faction? These are just a few of the concerns arising. Others might ask what the verdict will be for average civilians under current conditions, with the group persisting to target its own adversaries and critics.

Latest developments have once again highlighted the gaps of local media coverage on both sides of the Gazan frontier. Each outlet strives to examine every possible angle of Hamas’s violations of the peace. And, in general, the fact that the organization has been stalling the return of the bodies of killed Israeli hostages has monopolized the coverage.

On the other hand, reporting of non-combatant deaths in the region resulting from Israeli strikes has received scant attention – if any. Take the Israeli retaliatory attacks after a recent Rafah incident, in which a pair of military personnel were lost. While Gaza’s officials claimed dozens of deaths, Israeli television commentators questioned the “moderate answer,” which targeted just infrastructure.

This is nothing new. During the previous few days, Gaza’s press agency alleged Israel of violating the truce with Hamas 47 occasions since the truce was implemented, causing the death of 38 Palestinians and harming an additional 143. The assertion seemed insignificant to the majority of Israeli media outlets – it was merely absent. That included information that eleven individuals of a local family were killed by Israeli troops last Friday.

Gaza’s civil defence agency reported the individuals had been attempting to return to their home in the Zeitoun neighbourhood of Gaza City when the bus they were in was fired upon for allegedly going over the “yellow line” that demarcates areas under Israeli army control. This limit is unseen to the naked eye and is visible only on plans and in government records – not always available to ordinary people in the region.

Yet this event barely rated a mention in Israeli journalism. One source covered it in passing on its online platform, referencing an IDF official who explained that after a suspicious vehicle was spotted, forces fired alerting fire towards it, “but the transport continued to move toward the soldiers in a manner that created an imminent threat to them. The troops opened fire to eliminate the danger, in line with the agreement.” Zero casualties were reported.

Amid this narrative, it is no surprise a lot of Israelis think the group alone is to at fault for infringing the truce. This view threatens encouraging calls for a tougher stance in the region.

At some point – possibly sooner rather than later – it will no longer be enough for US envoys to act as kindergarten teachers, telling the Israeli government what to avoid. They will {have to|need